$3k would be another 6-core 3.33 if that helps. Only if you shop ebay for used parts, and by then whatever Intel and Apple agree on next go round new is a better system solution most of the time than to throw $3000 into an older system. So find the bottlenecks or throw everything at the problem and hope. The 12-core Mac Pro earned a single-core score of 1090 and a multi-core score of 11599, while the 16-core machine earned. Testing conducted by Apple in July 2021 using shipping 2.5GHz 28-core Intel Xeon Wbased Mac Pro systems with 384GB of RAM and pre-production dual AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo graphics with Infinity Fabric Link and 64GB of GDDR6 each and production 2. More RAM helps some areas but not rendering. Similar scores can also be seen in the higher-core Mac Pro models as well. This guy goes kind of crazy with custom setup 12-core 3.33s, 960GB SSD PCIe and 96GB RAM. W3680s are relatively cheap $600, you will not find X5600 sets unless you can make your system pay for whatever you throw at it and do so in a year to write it off and pay for doing more projects and more income. The real reason people bought dual with lower clock was hoping it would do more work, but when you have 3.33GHz a lot of work that cann't be dispatched and is not multi-thread or multicore all benefit. ie, there are times when two 6-core Mac Pros are faster than one 12-core, given the same GHz. Apple Mac Pro - Intel Xeon E5 3.7 GHz x2 - 12GB - 256 GB SSD - Mac O/S Catalina 10.15 - Gold Grade Refurbished - 12 Months Return To Base Warranty Apple Mac Pro - Tower - Xeon E5 / 3.7 GHz - RAM 12GB - SSD 256 GB - FirePro D300 Dual Channel- GigE - WLAN: Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11a/b/g/n/ac - Catalina 10.15 - monitor: none 12 Months Return To Base. If you rely on cpu alone, it may look like it is working, or lagging, or wating, but with the combined power of GPGPU can make all the difference.Ĭommunicating over Quick-Path is okay but Intel knows that they need to up the GT and 元 cache to improve it more.

Apple mac pro 12 core